"It is a big idea: a New World Order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom and the rule of law." -USA's president George Bush in his State of the Union address on January 29, 1991
In today's society we see how the power elite is about to unite Europe and the rest of the world into a centralized international system, using the keyword "peace". But the question is: Do we obtain peace when men are subject to massive laws, created by the elite, that rule the individual "on his hands and feet"?
The struggle for European unity and world dominion and power has been going on for a long time. Throughout history people have experienced civil wars, world wars and revolutions like the French and the Russian revolution but none has been of such dimensions as the global revolution that now is developing very fast.
The leaders of the world have obviously realized that it is very difficult to unite Europe and the rest of the world with bullets and gunpowder. Therefore they now try to bind the nations together through diplomacy and strong alliances like EU, GATT, NATO, UN and others.
In this connection many ask themselves: "Why do they try over and over again to unite sovereign nations under an international system of government? What forces are behind, and what are they up to?" These are some of the questions we will try to answer in this booklet.
THE BORDERS ARE BROKEN DOWN
We understand that there is a struggle for world dominion by the following statement: "We must replace balance of power politics with world order politics." (Jimmy Carter 1976).
The Humanist Manifesto II (1973): "We deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds. We have reached a turning point in human history where the best option is to transcend the limits of national sovereignity and to move toward the building of a world community.... a system of world law and world order based upon transnational federal government."
Adolf Hitler, cited in The Occult and the Third Rich: "National socialism will use its own revolution for the establishing of a new world order." From Brock Chisolm, director of the United Nation World Health Organization in SCP Journal, 1991: "To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism and religious dogmas."
From the Rothschild publication, The Economist, June 28 1991: "America needs to remember that a willingness to involve others is not enough to make a collective world order work. There must also be readiness to submit to it. If America really wants such an order, it will have to be ready to take its complaints to the GATT, finance the multilateral aid agencies, submit itself to the International Court, bow to some system of monitoring arms exports and make a habit of consulting the U.N."
OLD, BUT RENEWED POLICY
It is also interesting to note that the world's most influential persons today like Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Warren Christopher, Dalai Lama, Mikhail Gorbachev, Gro H. Brundtland, Pope John Paul II and others are strong advocates for a new world order.
When Mikhail Gorbachev resigned as the president of the Soviet Union in 1991, he wrote a letter to the Norwegian prime minister, Gro Harlem Brundtland, in which he expressed hope that she would do her best to "carry on the work that has started in the later years for a new world order." 
Today the leaders of the world do not talk much about national laws. Rather they speak loudly about global policy, world economy, world government, common foreign policy, international rules and so on.
Several international and European organizations like UN, NATO, GATT, EU, ONE WORLD and others are strong advocates of a European or international government. The same holds true for the big international secret organizations, that govern much of the world behind closed doors.
One of the secret organizations are the Bilderbergers, formed by the power elite in 1954. They work for European unity and world dominion. At one of their first meetings (1957) "it was generally recognized that it is our common responsibility to arrive in the shortest possible time at the highest degree of integration, beginning with a common market."
From the confidential papers at the meeting in March 1955 we read:"Participants in the Bilderberg Conferences would use, as much as possible, the various meetings and conferences which they attend elsewhere in order to put forward ideas and suggestions made at Bilderberg."
The participants are encouraged to go home to their own country and act the role they were given. They will try to place their own country under international laws, created by the world elite. The borders will cease to exist, and the national laws must give way to the international laws. Do we see this trend today?
A big and systematic play of roles is in progress, and the actors are many. It is important for us to understand this kind of role playing, so that we are not deceived. When we discover that Bill Clinton, Gro H. Brundtland, Karl Bildt, Ruud Lubbers, David Oddson and others are members of this group, then we understand better why they work for European unity and a collective, global law.
Just before the EU vote in Norway, Nov. 28 1994, this writer visited the former prime minister, Per Borten. He knew very well that Gro H. Brundtland was a member of the secret Bilderberger group. He had also been asked to become a member in this secret order, but had declined.
Shortly before we left him, we expressed the wish that the majority would vote NO to EU. "Yes, then there will be a brief let up, for these forces will not give in", said this stalwart Prime Minister.
Comission: The worlds
economy will be centralized.
THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION
Another secret organization is The Trilateral Commission (TC) a relation between USA, Japan and Europe, formed in 1973. The purpose of this secret organization was nothing less than "bringing together the best brains in the world, to solve the problems of the future" And: "What the Trilaterals truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political government of the nation states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future."
Individuals from the most influential countries in this world are involved in this "club". They seek to create directions that the rest of the world are going to follow. They think it important to govern the economy of the world and clear the way for a collective, global rule. It is this model we see today through the international system of laws.
THE EUROPEAN UNION AND GLOBAL SOCIALISM
It is just about the same trend we see in EU. First they formed an economic alliance between nations. Then a political alliance and finally they formed a union. Other independent countries that initially chose not to be a member, are literally forced to go in, bacically due to (economic) pressure from external forces, for instance by embargoes of goods and articles in connection with a (simulated) conflict, high tariff walls (for instance in connection with the Schengen agreement), currency crisis and similar happenings.
taken from the American one dollar bill.
It is also interesting to notice that because Norway did not become a member of EU at the election in 1994, the EU-friendly forces now try to get the laws in through the back door by the special agreement Norway has with EU, called EEC (European Economical Cooperation). Because of EEC there comes a steady stream of new rules prepared in Brüssels into the Norwegian Parliament. Almost all the new rules are accepted in the Parliament and not a sentence nor a comma is changed. The government ignores the Norwegian constitution § 49. Among others this paragraph says that the Norwegian people are the ones to make laws for Norway.
It is important that we make determined efforts to protect the individual"s freedom and right to choose, and not let men and systems control us. Individuality, freedom and the right to own property are man's irrefutable rights.
Contrary to this we oserve today that several politicians are more occupied with collective European and international laws, where the power elite's intolerant and controlling principles are applied. There are strong international forces behind this kind of pressure.
Today we observe that the policy is planned in such a way that for instance small private farms are closed down in great numbers. They are not subsidized like the big farms, and they are not allowed to run the farm as they want. The demands are too stiff, and nearly everything is controlled and ruled by the bureaucrats through their prepared set of regulations.
Small local businesses, fishing boats, industrial enterprises and others are also closed down on a big scale. The result is that people more and more seem to be dependent on the state and the authorities. It is a fact that when the economic basis is removed from the farmer, he will be dependent on the state. And the state is ruled by the power elite. In this way the Socialistic State is gradually getting more power.
We have for some time seen that the State and the local authorities have given subsidies to different enterprises, institutions and so on. Several have succumbed to the temptation of accepting the subsidies. After a length of time they have actually become totally dependent on the resources provided by the state in order to run their business. Now these subsidies are gradually taken away from several private enterprises. The end result is a lack of funds, which forces them into bankruptcy, and who do you think takes over?
Today the different branches are encouraged to combine and to merge in order to rationalize and to become bigger and stronger. In this way the central authorities have prepared a policy that makes the society more centralized which is just what the power elite wants.
THE EUROPEAN MOVEMENT
The European movement's purpose is: "The foundation of Europe's United nations, one government, one parliament and two chambers elected by general elections, one court of justice and one economic council."
the European Movement, ends in
loyality towards BrŘssels!
The international European movement was founded in 1949. The Norwegian branch was established May 30 of the same year at a meeting in Stortinget (the Parliament of Norway). Later May 7, 1969 the European movement's parliamentary group was founded by a statutory meeting in the Parliament building itself. A preliminary aim was thereby reached. The movement now had gained influence in the legislative assembly a real influence. In 1970 120 out of the 150 representatives of Parliament were members of this movement.
The representatives of Parliament that also are members of the European movement have one foot in Brüssels and one foot in the Norwegian constitution, however the end result is a "yes" to Brussels. This leads us into another authority of State that has legislative, executive and judiciary powers. Beware of this movement!
The representatives of this movement have also voted for the new pharagraph 93, which became a part of the New Constitution in 1962, permitting Norway to give up sovereignty in a limited area. By approving the EEC agreement in Parliament they have avoided the vote of the people and the agreement is more comprehensive than what the people voted "No" to in 1972!!
Many have been naive when they have believed that our members of Parliament have ruled the country according to the Constitution's aims and principles. Instead they have sold themselves to an international organization that does not respect self government, nor that Norway shall be a free and independent nation. Already we can see which forces that are working together in Norway to sell our sovereignty cheaper than a mess of pottage.
GATT, the World Bank, The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and others are also instrumental in bringing about a centralized, international administration.
Several secret organizations like the Aspen Institute, the Council of Foreign Relations, the Club of Rome and others are also working for European unity and world rule. It will take too much space to write more thoroughly about these now, but let us close with the Masonic Lodge.
The Masonic Lodge is by many looked upon as a "men's club" that has social gatherings and some coziness together. Jack Harris, a freemason high up in the system , but deserted, writes among other things: "In progress is a chess game of enormous proportions. Those who became Masons for a little fun and fellowship are really the pawns in this game. They create a front or cover for the real action of this game plan. Behind the scenes are the master gamesmen manipulating our government and the world for eventual domination and political checkmate."
In the same book the Masonry's purpose is revealed: "Even though Masonry claims a belief in a Supreme Being (god of nature; a force), the end result of Masonic belief is identical to that of humanism, namely the deification of man and an elite controlled new world order. As Albert Pike has indicated, the goal of Masonry is world empire."
It is interesting to note in this connection that the leaders of Masonry in the different countries are members of honour at the foreign lodges. Masonry is an international system.
Like other secret organizations, Masonry tries its best to recruit men in important positions of society as members. They want men who are decision-makers. Higher up in the system mystical and occult ceremonies take place, and members may lose their lives if they tell what is going on in the lodges. You will find this in their own sources.
Finally, a quotation from Masonry's own sources, of what they are free to do: "You must conceal all the crimes of your brother Masons, except murder and treason, and these only at your own option, and should you be summoned as a witness against your brother Mason be always sure to shield him. Prevaricate, do not tell the whole truth in this case, keep his secrets, forget the most important points. It may be perjury to do this, it is true, but you are keeping your obligations, and remember if you live up to your obligation strictly, you will be free from sin."
It is quite common that the influential men in this world are members of several secret organizations. The secret organizations also have their men and women inside the big TV and radio stations all over the world, inside governments, trade unions and quorum organs. "The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes."
THE ROLE OF THE UN
In today's society we see that the UN will play an important role to gather the world under the control of the power elite. Many look upon the Gulf crisis as a part of this process. And since that time several independent nations have strongly contributed to the fact that the UN at an ever increasing extent operates as a world police. The military forces of the nations are more and more coming under the control and command of the UN. At the same time the independent nations rather rapidly now fall into line with the international rules that the UN and the masters of the world creates. It looks like kings and governments have given up the thought of self-management in their own countries.
The UN is today about to create a Catholic dominated international military control.
NATURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTERS
Today you find a lot of activities put forth in order to save our planet from heavy environmental disasters. Mankind itself is behind this environmental destruction.Atom bombs, the splitting of atoms, leakages of atomic reactors, poisonous gasses, chemicals, concentrated poisonous liquids and substances, and so on, are getting out into the air, into the water and into the soil. Both men and animals suffer or die an early death, because of the serious damage caused. Nature itself suffers and is thrown into disorder.
When men have damaged and still are damaging the environment on our planet, it seems that the power elite also takes advantage of this condition in order to try to unite the world. "We have to stick together in order to save our planet", they say. At the same time the destruction continues on a large scale.
Thus it looks as if the power elite today uses the environmental problem as another means to gather the world under their control.
MONEY AS THE UNIFYING FACTOR
Money is power. Bill Clinton's Jesuit professor at Georgetown University, Carrol Quigley, writes that the purpose of the capitalistic forces has been "nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole."
one hand (by loans, subsidies, grants etc.)
and take with the other hand (by interest,
VAT and ever increasing
and higher duties and taxes)!
Today we see this has materialized. The banks, especially the big banks, are mainly privately owned, and nations having great economic problems borrow money from these. Several nations, like the USA, Canada, Sweden and others have such large loans that they hardly know how to remedy the situation. They have become slaves to the moneybarons, as well as a tool in the hands of the power elite, who then can influence and control the nations as they want.
Those who have the money are often important members in one or more of the international, secret organizations. They rule much of the things going on in the world by finance.
A common currency and central bank are factors the European and the global elite use, in order to bind up the world. That is a part in the process that leads to the fact that more and more power is transferred from the national government to the international bureaucracy.
MUTUAL CHURCH MOVEMENTS ON WHAT BASIS?
Within the religious field there is a centralization going on. Bishops and priests have made their own system, a hierarchical system, where new guidelines are pointed out by the religious power elite, through the big church councils like the World Alliance, the Lutheran World Association, the World Council of Churches and others. They try to unite through "buzz words" like ecumenic, solidarity, charismatic, mutual divine services, prayermeetings, an ecumenical/Catholic Communion, new theological songbooks and so on. For a long time they have tried to find common profession of faith, that frequently is not a "thus sayeth the Lord!". Points of believes upon which they cannot agree, even if it is a clear biblical teaching, they just let it be.
In all this ecumenical thrust we witness how protestantism is broken down, and little by little give way to Catholicism. This is not the unity that Jesus talks about. True Christian unity is built on all that Jesus stood for and preached both in His life and His teachings. Ecumenism and Catholicism are something completely different from biblical unity. In reality they are obstacles in the way to TRUE christian unity.
It is surprising to see today how protestant denominations are courting the Catholic Church, a church the early reformers called Antichrist.
Martin Luther, who grew up as a Catholic, knew the Catholic Church from within. He said:
1. "I said formerly that the pope was Christ's vicar. Now I assert that he is our Lord's adversary, and the devil's apostle."
2. "It is a horrible thing to behold that the man who styles himself as Christ´s vicegerent, displaying a magnificence that no emperor can equal. Is this being like the poor Jesus, or the humble Peter? He is, say they, the lord of the world! But Christ, whose vicar he boasts of being, said, "My kingdom is not of this world."Can the dominions of a vicar extend beyond those of his superior?"
3. When the papal bull reached Luther, he declared: " I despise and attack it, as impious, false... It is Christ Himself who is condemned therein.... I rejoice in having to bear such ills for the best of causes. Already I feel greater liberty in my heart; for at last I know that the POPE IS ANTICHRIST, AND THAT HIS THRONE IS THAT OF SATAN HIMSELF."
From the confessions of the evangelical Lutheran Church Luther is quoted: "But it is manifest that the Roman pontiffs and their adherents defend godless doctrines and godless forms of worship, and it is plain that the marks of the Antichrist coincide with those of the pope´s kingdom and his followers." Luther was correct in this because all the Bible´s signs coincide with the papacy. But which Protestant priest would dare to say that loud and clear today publicly? (See the frame on the next page.)
THE PAPACY´S AIM AND STRATEGY'S
One of the aims of the Papacy is religious exaltation. It has not forgotten its goal, namely to gather Europe and the rest of the world under the umbrella of the Catholic Church. In order to reach this objective it looks with favourable eyes on the European Movement, secret organizations, church alliances, political parties and others that may help it on its way to conquer the lost power of The Middle Ages.
Today we see the Papacy regain its power through the USA Congress, which has a large number of Catholics, and not least through the Catholic friendly President Bill Clinton who was educated at Georgetown University, a Catholic Jesuit university.
In Europe the Papacy works through EU. Did you know that strong Catholic personalities were the central figures when EU was founded; people like Jean Monnet, Robert Schumann, Konrad Adenauer, Alcide de Gasperi, Joseph Retinger and others?
The Swedish ambassador at the Vatican, says it this way: "We are not to forget that EU was founded by very dedicated Catholics like the German Adenauer, the Frenchman Schumann and the Italian De Gasperi." He admits openly that EU was founded by Catholics.
Jacques Delors, who has been the leader of EU for many years, has, together with his companions, changed EU from an economic alliance into a new authority of state, having legislative, executive and judiciary power. He is a Catholic. So is the powerful man in Germany, Helmuth Kohl, and very many others in EU´s top elite. More than half of the population in EU-countries are Catholics, and now new Catholic countries eagerly wait to become members of EU, like Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Hungary.
SOME IDENTIFYING MARKS
RELIGION AND POLITICS
It is easy to understand that much of the political activities are run by Catholic forces. They try to get their men and women in top positions, where the decisions are made. This is confirmed by their own sources: "Many noncatholics fear us as a political organization, and are afraid that the Catholic Church will dominate and rule; we are working quietly, seriously and I may say effectively, to that end."
"All Catholics must make themselves felt as active elements in the daily political life in the countries where they live. All Catholics should exert their power to cause the constitution of the states to be modeled on the principles of the true church."
"The supreme duty of Catholics is to obey the Pope, and seek in every way, and especially by means of the ballot, to render the Catholic policy effective in this country."
The Catholic Church almost commands all Catholics to participate in the political life so that the laws of the nations will be formed according to the principles of their church. That is what we see today, especially in the USA and EU.
We have a rather fresh example of the fact that the Catholics are very active in politics. The Catholic Church threw itself into the Polish election campaign autumn 1995. The church openly urged the Catholics to participate in the election, and to rally around a Catholic candidate, in order to get a Catholic as president of Poland.
It is quite obvious that strong Catholic personalities like Helmuth Kohl and Klaus Kinkel wish to include Norway, with plenty of resources, as a member of the EU chain. When Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Goebbels, Himler and others, who all were Catholics and cooperated closely with the Catholic Church, failed in uniting Europe under the Catholic umbrella in 1940 - 45, new blocks were soon formed in order to bind Europe and the rest of the world together through strong confederations and alliances. This is a Catholic pattern. The world is going to be ruled by massive international laws. They want the people little by little to obey these laws, if not voluntarily, then by force. We must not forget that the Catholic Church is just as much an economic/political power as a religious power. It works by long range plans, and does not give up very easily even if one or two battles are lost. Diplomacy, solidarity and peace are keywords that are used in order to bind the world together into strong alliances and confederations at a political, economical and religious level.
The Catholic Church has always wanted to use the state as a helper. Since Germany has been the center of power in Europe, it has been the church´s determination to join forces with this nation in order to promote its long range goals. Let us briefly look at only two examples:
1. Adolf Hitler, who was a Catholic, was educated by nuns at a boy's school. In his struggle to obtain power, he used the church and the church used him. In 1933 an alliance (Concordat) between Germany and the Vatican was signed. By this concordat the church received more power, and helped Hitler into power. Hitler himself said:"I learned much from the Order of the Jesuits. Until now there has never been anything more grandiose on the earth than the hierarchical organization of the Catholic Church. I transformed much of this organization into my own party."
Regarding Protestants and the question of the Jews he said: "I reject Rosenberg's book. It was written by a protestant. It is not a party book.... as a Catholic I never feel comfortable in the evangelical church or its structures...... As for the Jews, I am just carrying on with the same policy which the Catholic Church has adopted for fifteen hundred years."
One of Hitler's close coworkers, Franz von Papen, said: "The Third Reich is the first world power which not only acknowledges but also puts into practice the high principles of the papacy."
2. It is also interesting to notice what was said when the German emperor, Wilhelm II, visited the Vatican in 1922. The emperor describes how the pope looked upon the role of Germany this way: "It was interesting to me that the Pope said to me on this occasion that Germany must become the sword of the Catholic Church."
Today we see that the USA´s jesuittrained and Catholic-friendly President, Bill Clinton, encourages Germany to play the role as the big brother in EU. Do we get the feeling what kind of influence the Catholics have in Europe and elsewhere in this world? But this is not all!
CATHOLIC PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
In Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, England, the USA and elsewhere, the members of the Catholic Church have infiltrated important positions in society. In Norway we have among others a Catholic Public Prosecutor Georg Fredrik Rieber Mohn. This writer has written an open letter to the Public Prosecutor and to several Norwegian newspapers and asked if the Norwegian Prime Minister, and the activities of the European Movement, are not in conflict with § 83 in the penal code, which says: "Those who contrary to the law seek to bring about or contribute to the fact that Norway or some part of the kingdom is brought under foreign rule, or is incorporated in another state, or that some part of the kingdom is disconnected, are punished with jail from 8 to 21 years."
The Public Prosecutor answered rather shortly: "I don't agree with your understanding of the penal code § 83. Your request does not lead to any steps from this office."
This answer proves that the Catholic Public Prosecutor will not prevent the Norwegian Prime Minister´s course toward Brüssels. And we can ask: Why should the Catholic Public Prosecutor go against his fellow believers in Brüssels, and prevent the Protestant country of Norway from being placed under the Catholic dominated EU? You see, both the Catholic public Prosecutor as well as the Catholic dominated elite in Brüssels know that if they can get the Protestant country of Norway into the EU chain, they may in the next round lead us wherever they want. Protestantism will then be more easily influenced and led by Catholics and their way of thinking.
THE SUBSIDIARY PRINCIPLE
The entire EU system is of Catholic origin. It is ruled according to the so-called Subsidiary principle, (The Maastrict treaty page 4 and the Catholic Church´s catechism page 470). This word comes from the Latin word subsidium, and means to help. In the Norwegian language this word is translated to "The principle of nearness", and gives the impression that this model of governing is very democratic. This model of governing means that they are going to try to solve conflicts at a local level. If they do not succeed locally, the cases go centrally in the system. This ultimately forces the parties to conform to the rules of the power elite.
We understand this model better when we know that the subsidiary principle was put forward by Pope Leo XIII in his "Shepherding letter" from 1891. Here he told how the world should be ruled, and the model was the subsidiary principle. This principle was repeated one hundred years later by Pope John Paul II through his "Shepherding letter" - "Centessimus Annus". This is a hierarchical model of rule, where the elite with the pope at the top is the legislative authority. This is also EU´s model of Catholic "democracy"!
The Catholic Church´s new catechism writes very eloquently about allowing individuality, freedom of conscience and respect for the individual. But the individual must when there are disputes, and points of controversy or disagreement finally comply with the authorities (the laws of the elite). The laws of the elite are going to be "the principle of the "rule of law", in which the law is sovereign, and not the arbitrary will of men" (or conscience). "The diversity of political regimes is legitimate, provided they contribute to the common good of the community." (The common good of the community based on the ideas of the Catholic Church.)
The final conclusion of the subsidiary principle is that the higher governing powers of the community are going to support and help the lower governing powers of the community "to coordinate its activity with the activities of the rest of society, always with a view to the common good."
As a final result the individual therefore has to act in concert with the community, and what benefits the common good. We can see that here we find great possibilities for oppression, for example of the one who by matter of conscience finds it wrong to adapt his life according to the majority.
[Back to the Main Page!]